<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is one tonne of carbon dioxide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.runforoneplanet.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.runforoneplanet.com/?p=113</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://blog.runforoneplanet.com/?p=113&#038;cpage=1#comment-3617</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delta/r41p/blog/?p=113#comment-3617</guid>
		<description>are you actually doing nothing but talking all you people do is talk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you actually doing nothing but talking all you people do is talk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.runforoneplanet.com/?p=113&#038;cpage=1#comment-2909</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delta/r41p/blog/?p=113#comment-2909</guid>
		<description>48lbs of Carbon dioxide may be what a mature tree absorbs, but young fast growing species, such as those used in short cycle coppice systems can be far more effective at producing tonnage of woody organic matter. While people like to see mature trees in their environment they are not necessarily the most effective way to offset carbon, nor the most economically viable.

&lt;a&gt;Short Rotation Willow Coppice&lt;/a&gt; is one such wood crop which produces useful fuel products on a time-scale that makes it appealing for conventional farmers. When combined with technology that produces biochar as a by-product then we have a completely different scenario (biochar sequesters carbon permanently in soil) and the overall system is carbon negative.

You calculations also seem to imply that the woody mass of the trees planted  is simply removed from the carbon cycle at the end of its life cycle. In reality while some of that carbon will be trapped in building timber the majority of it will return to the atmosphere, either burnt as firewood or through decomposition.

So, basing your calculation on a number of mature trees seems fundamentally flawed - they do not remove that carbon from the atmosphere permanently, and are not equivalent to not emitting the CO2 in the first place. At the very best planting trees delays the impact that your one tonne of carbon would have. Oh, and we would have to plant the same number of new trees next year too, and the year after that...

At best this is over simplified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>48lbs of Carbon dioxide may be what a mature tree absorbs, but young fast growing species, such as those used in short cycle coppice systems can be far more effective at producing tonnage of woody organic matter. While people like to see mature trees in their environment they are not necessarily the most effective way to offset carbon, nor the most economically viable.</p>
<p><a>Short Rotation Willow Coppice</a> is one such wood crop which produces useful fuel products on a time-scale that makes it appealing for conventional farmers. When combined with technology that produces biochar as a by-product then we have a completely different scenario (biochar sequesters carbon permanently in soil) and the overall system is carbon negative.</p>
<p>You calculations also seem to imply that the woody mass of the trees planted  is simply removed from the carbon cycle at the end of its life cycle. In reality while some of that carbon will be trapped in building timber the majority of it will return to the atmosphere, either burnt as firewood or through decomposition.</p>
<p>So, basing your calculation on a number of mature trees seems fundamentally flawed - they do not remove that carbon from the atmosphere permanently, and are not equivalent to not emitting the CO2 in the first place. At the very best planting trees delays the impact that your one tonne of carbon would have. Oh, and we would have to plant the same number of new trees next year too, and the year after that&#8230;</p>
<p>At best this is over simplified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Run For One Planet Blog &#187; Bio Fuel</title>
		<link>http://blog.runforoneplanet.com/?p=113&#038;cpage=1#comment-1839</link>
		<dc:creator>Run For One Planet Blog &#187; Bio Fuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delta/r41p/blog/?p=113#comment-1839</guid>
		<description>[...] deceased biological material. Now this is a carbon based fuel. Like we talked about back in &#8216;What is One Tonne of Carbon?&#8216; plants take in water sunlight carbon dioxide and using photosynthesis produce sugar. That [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] deceased biological material. Now this is a carbon based fuel. Like we talked about back in &#8216;What is One Tonne of Carbon?&#8216; plants take in water sunlight carbon dioxide and using photosynthesis produce sugar. That [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candy</title>
		<link>http://blog.runforoneplanet.com/?p=113&#038;cpage=1#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Candy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delta/r41p/blog/?p=113#comment-63</guid>
		<description>I'll tell you who got whistled at!!! It was meant for that hot guy in the van with the great cheek-bones! His name is MATT!

No offence to you gals - I'm sure you are whislte-worthy, when you're cleaned up! But we all know: Grungy guys - HOT, Grungy girs - NOT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll tell you who got whistled at!!! It was meant for that hot guy in the van with the great cheek-bones! His name is MATT!</p>
<p>No offence to you gals - I&#8217;m sure you are whislte-worthy, when you&#8217;re cleaned up! But we all know: Grungy guys - HOT, Grungy girs - NOT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
